The Evolution of Hip Arthroscopy: What Has Changed Since 2008—A Single Surgeon's Experience
Authors
Domb BG, Chen SL, Shapira J, Maldonado DR, Lall AC, Rosinsky PJ
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.10.009
Background
Hip arthroscopy has evolved over time, and this study compares the early (2008) and later (2016) cases performed by a single surgeon to understand how techniques, patient selection, and outcomes have improved.
Methods
The study reviewed the first 200 hip arthroscopy cases (Group A) and the last 200 cases (Group B) performed by a single surgeon. They compared surgical procedures, patient outcomes, and the use of new techniques.
Key Findings
Newer procedures, such as labral reconstructions, capsular closures, and femoroplasty, were more common in recent cases. Group B showed significantly better patient-reported outcomes and a higher rate of achieving minimal clinically important differences in hip function.
Conclusions
Hip arthroscopy has evolved significantly between 2008 and 2016, with improved patient outcomes, better surgical techniques, and more effective preoperative evaluations.
What Does This Mean for Patients
If you're undergoing hip arthroscopy, newer techniques developed over the past few years may lead to better results and quicker recovery. Ensure that your surgeon is up to date with the latest advancements.