Robotic Arm-assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty is More Cost-Effective Than Manual Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Markov Model Analysis

Robotic Arm-assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty is More Cost-Effective Than Manual Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Markov Model Analysis

Authors

Maldonado DR, Go CC, Kyin C, Rosinsky PJ, Shapira J, Lall AC, Domb BG
DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-00498

Background

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a standard procedure for hip osteoarthritis. Recent innovations, such as robotic arm-assisted (RAA) technology, promise more precise and consistent results, but it's unclear if the additional cost is justified.

Methods

A Markov model was used to compare the cost-effectiveness of robotic arm-assisted THA versus manual THA, considering medical costs and clinical outcomes over 5 years.

Key Findings

The study showed that robotic-assisted THA was more cost-effective than manual THA, saving money for both Medicare and private insurance while also providing slightly better health outcomes.

Conclusions

Robotic arm-assisted THA is a cost-effective alternative to manual THA and may provide better clinical results, making it a valuable option for patients needing hip replacement.

What Does This Mean for Patients

If you are considering hip replacement, robotic-assisted surgery might offer a more cost-effective option that could lead to better long-term outcomes, especially if you are covered by Medicare or private insurance.